Post by NFA on May 29, 2024 5:41:59 GMT 8
This is all about an agenda, one that, if we don’t end it, will result in the demise of life as we know it
By Milt Harris — May 28, 2024
COP stands for Conference of the Parties (COP) and refers to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) international meeting, which is the main decision-making body of the UNFCCC.
Translation: A committee of liars.
Translation: A committee of liars.
No scientific basis for the fast-paced fossil fuel phaseout agenda
At the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland, earlier this year, a group of influential individuals suggested that implementing carbon taxes is necessary. They also mentioned that the required framework to implement these taxes is already in place and must be implemented. It was also noted that obtaining more funding and reaffirming the global necessity to combat climate change will be crucial at the upcoming COP29 and COP30 events. However, the previous climate forum, COP28, faced challenges as the meeting's president acknowledged that there was no scientific basis for the fast-paced fossil fuel phaseout agenda.
There is an expression that says if you tell a lie long enough and often enough, people will believe it. By their own admission, there is no scientific basis for the fast-paced fossil fuel phaseout agenda. In other words, the entire story is being fabricated.
The Earth is estimated to be 4.54 billion years old. Like other planets, it was formed in the early days of the Solar System, which began to form about 4.6 billion years ago.
The Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research located in the U.K. has some temperature measurements beginning in 1850, but there is insufficient data before 1880 for scientists to estimate average temperatures for the entire planet.
At the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos, Switzerland, earlier this year, a group of influential individuals suggested that implementing carbon taxes is necessary. They also mentioned that the required framework to implement these taxes is already in place and must be implemented. It was also noted that obtaining more funding and reaffirming the global necessity to combat climate change will be crucial at the upcoming COP29 and COP30 events. However, the previous climate forum, COP28, faced challenges as the meeting's president acknowledged that there was no scientific basis for the fast-paced fossil fuel phaseout agenda.
There is an expression that says if you tell a lie long enough and often enough, people will believe it. By their own admission, there is no scientific basis for the fast-paced fossil fuel phaseout agenda. In other words, the entire story is being fabricated.
The Earth is estimated to be 4.54 billion years old. Like other planets, it was formed in the early days of the Solar System, which began to form about 4.6 billion years ago.
The Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research located in the U.K. has some temperature measurements beginning in 1850, but there is insufficient data before 1880 for scientists to estimate average temperatures for the entire planet.
"Global warming will be dead by 2030"
So, the planet is 4.54 billion years old, and we have accurate temperature readings for less than 150 years. There is no such thing as climate change, and we need to shoot down these lies at every opportunity.
In fact, a prominent meteorologist is cautioning that the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) "Net Zero" policies, aimed at reducing carbon emissions, could potentially harm the Earth's climate in just a few years.
A new study has shown that global efforts to reduce carbon dioxide will trigger an atmospheric breakdown, cooling the planet and leading to a period of colder temperatures.
Professor David Dilley issued the warning. Dilley is a former meteorologist for the NOAA National Weather Service, a paleoclimatologist, and the CEO and founder of Global Weather Oscillations, a weather cycle technology company.
So, the planet is 4.54 billion years old, and we have accurate temperature readings for less than 150 years. There is no such thing as climate change, and we need to shoot down these lies at every opportunity.
In fact, a prominent meteorologist is cautioning that the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) "Net Zero" policies, aimed at reducing carbon emissions, could potentially harm the Earth's climate in just a few years.
A new study has shown that global efforts to reduce carbon dioxide will trigger an atmospheric breakdown, cooling the planet and leading to a period of colder temperatures.
Professor David Dilley issued the warning. Dilley is a former meteorologist for the NOAA National Weather Service, a paleoclimatologist, and the CEO and founder of Global Weather Oscillations, a weather cycle technology company.
Professor Dilley, with over fifty years of experience in meteorology, developed the groundbreaking ClimatePulse Technology. This technology is based on the geomagnetic cycles of the Sun, Moon, and Earth and their alignment with climate and weather cycles.
Dilley made a surprising prediction that leftists are unable to refute, saying: “Global warming will be dead by 2030.”
Dilley made a surprising prediction that leftists are unable to refute, saying: “Global warming will be dead by 2030.”
The main determinant of climate change is the Sun, not manmade carbon dioxide
This could be seen as a positive development if global warming were as dire as climate alarmists assert. However, the planet's warmth facilitates the proliferation of life by maintaining ideal levels of carbon dioxide, which is essential for plant growth.
The main determinant of climate change is the Sun, not manmade carbon dioxide. Professor Dilley explains two main factors responsible for the regular cyclical changes in global temperatures: the Earth's proximity to the sun based on its elliptical orbit and its variable tilt.
Dilley claims that when you look at how things have played out over several hundred thousand years, the temperatures we’re seeing right now are on par with what would be expected.
The current warm cycle, the smallest in the past 8,000 years, indicates that we are at its peak.
Dilley explained that this means temperatures will significantly decrease in the coming decades, and not necessarily in a positive way. On the Tom Nelson Podcast, he further explained how the moon also affects short-term climate change.
We live at the beach, and we all know that the moon affects tides and the movement of the oceans. So why is it such a stretch for people to believe that it also plays a role in earthquakes, volcanic activity, and floods?
Dilley also pointed out the many flaws in the arguments that carbon dioxide is at an all-time high and that this is somehow disastrous. He points out that CO2 can't change the Earth's orbit around the sun, nor can it change the orbit the moon takes around the Earth. It also can’t influence ice buildup at the poles, ocean temperatures, or volcanic activity.
Carbon dioxide only makes up 0.04 percent of the atmosphere, and humans are responsible for just 1 percent of this minuscule amount. The truth is that humans don't contribute significantly to the recent increase in carbon dioxide levels; instead, it primarily comes from CO2 released by warming oceans, which release it hundreds of years after temperatures rise.
It's important to emphasize that having more carbon dioxide benefits the earth, rather than having too little of it. This is a key point that tends to be deliberately overlooked by climate change alarmists.
This could be seen as a positive development if global warming were as dire as climate alarmists assert. However, the planet's warmth facilitates the proliferation of life by maintaining ideal levels of carbon dioxide, which is essential for plant growth.
The main determinant of climate change is the Sun, not manmade carbon dioxide. Professor Dilley explains two main factors responsible for the regular cyclical changes in global temperatures: the Earth's proximity to the sun based on its elliptical orbit and its variable tilt.
Dilley claims that when you look at how things have played out over several hundred thousand years, the temperatures we’re seeing right now are on par with what would be expected.
The current warm cycle, the smallest in the past 8,000 years, indicates that we are at its peak.
Dilley explained that this means temperatures will significantly decrease in the coming decades, and not necessarily in a positive way. On the Tom Nelson Podcast, he further explained how the moon also affects short-term climate change.
We live at the beach, and we all know that the moon affects tides and the movement of the oceans. So why is it such a stretch for people to believe that it also plays a role in earthquakes, volcanic activity, and floods?
Dilley also pointed out the many flaws in the arguments that carbon dioxide is at an all-time high and that this is somehow disastrous. He points out that CO2 can't change the Earth's orbit around the sun, nor can it change the orbit the moon takes around the Earth. It also can’t influence ice buildup at the poles, ocean temperatures, or volcanic activity.
Carbon dioxide only makes up 0.04 percent of the atmosphere, and humans are responsible for just 1 percent of this minuscule amount. The truth is that humans don't contribute significantly to the recent increase in carbon dioxide levels; instead, it primarily comes from CO2 released by warming oceans, which release it hundreds of years after temperatures rise.
It's important to emphasize that having more carbon dioxide benefits the earth, rather than having too little of it. This is a key point that tends to be deliberately overlooked by climate change alarmists.
Any notable reduction in CO2 levels would spell disaster for all life on the planet
There is no getting around the fact that carbon dioxide is essential for the earth's ecosystem and makes life on our planet possible.
Without CO2, plants wouldn't grow on land or in the water, which would end animal and human life. According to Dilley, any notable reduction in CO2 levels would spell disaster for all life on the planet.
Remember, by these fanatics' own admission, they have acknowledged that there was no scientific basis for the fast-paced fossil fuel phaseout agenda. This fake crisis is all about the transference of money, and it has nothing to do with the climate.
They know what they are doing. They aren’t preventing disaster; they are creating one. It’s time to come to grips with reality. Our presence on this planet is insignificant in terms of its long-term existence. How arrogant are these alarmists to think that 150 years of knowledge on a planet that is 4.54 billion years old is enough to make judgments?
That fact is that they can’t. This is all about an agenda, one that, if we don’t end it, will result in the demise of life as we know it.
There is no getting around the fact that carbon dioxide is essential for the earth's ecosystem and makes life on our planet possible.
Without CO2, plants wouldn't grow on land or in the water, which would end animal and human life. According to Dilley, any notable reduction in CO2 levels would spell disaster for all life on the planet.
Remember, by these fanatics' own admission, they have acknowledged that there was no scientific basis for the fast-paced fossil fuel phaseout agenda. This fake crisis is all about the transference of money, and it has nothing to do with the climate.
They know what they are doing. They aren’t preventing disaster; they are creating one. It’s time to come to grips with reality. Our presence on this planet is insignificant in terms of its long-term existence. How arrogant are these alarmists to think that 150 years of knowledge on a planet that is 4.54 billion years old is enough to make judgments?
That fact is that they can’t. This is all about an agenda, one that, if we don’t end it, will result in the demise of life as we know it.