Post by NFA on Oct 29, 2023 5:32:35 GMT 8
State Media
October 27, 2023 | Sundance
One of the larger misunderstandings, amid the broad U.S. public, stems from a disconnect about specific media outlets and deserves a few moments of clarity.
We are all familiar with the term “State Run Media” as it pertains to several foreign countries. However, the U.S. State Dept specifically saw the need for a similar communication control mechanism when the era of cable television originated.
Prior to cable television, the alphabets ABC, CBS and NBC were the dominant force in media. This made the information control essentially simple for the various U.S. government interests to manipulate. However, when cable television became popular, a more official control shift was needed. The result was CNN and CNNi.
Prior to cable television, the alphabets ABC, CBS and NBC were the dominant force in media. This made the information control essentially simple for the various U.S. government interests to manipulate. However, when cable television became popular, a more official control shift was needed. The result was CNN and CNNi.
Outside the USA, most foreign national governments accept that CNN/CNNi are part of the official message from the United States Dept of State. For all practical purposes, CNN carries the official narrative as espoused by the U.S. govt though the State Dept. CNN is the domestic equivalent of state media, and CNNi is the international outcome.
In the U.K., the interests of government are represented by the BBC (British Broadcasting Company). In Canada it’s CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Company). In the middle east, Qatar controls the dominant news of Al Jazeera. Each of these organizations expresses the perspective of information that comes directly from government. CNN is no different for the official U.S. narratives.
Please remind yourself of this non-pretending truth as you review information. Additionally, as customary in the U.S., we have outlets focused internally to support the various elements of subsections within government. The New York Times represents the interests of the Dept of Justice and FBI – in essence, the domestic federal law enforcement apparatus. The Washington Post represents the interests of the CIA and Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) – in essence the larger intelligence apparatus.
Combine the stakeholders, and CNN represents the State Dept, The Washington Post represents the CIA, and the New York Times represents the DOJ. The sourcing for information into these conduits is specialized sources, and the pattern of information dissemination never changes. Once you understand how this works, you are more able to discern what the government position is on any specific “story” or information.
Depending on the issue, you will notice this pattern never changes. It is the one constant in an ever-changing information war.
Every once in a while, it is worth reminding ourselves of this fundamental baseline. The pattern never changes.
All the best,
Sundance
In the U.K., the interests of government are represented by the BBC (British Broadcasting Company). In Canada it’s CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Company). In the middle east, Qatar controls the dominant news of Al Jazeera. Each of these organizations expresses the perspective of information that comes directly from government. CNN is no different for the official U.S. narratives.
Please remind yourself of this non-pretending truth as you review information. Additionally, as customary in the U.S., we have outlets focused internally to support the various elements of subsections within government. The New York Times represents the interests of the Dept of Justice and FBI – in essence, the domestic federal law enforcement apparatus. The Washington Post represents the interests of the CIA and Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) – in essence the larger intelligence apparatus.
Combine the stakeholders, and CNN represents the State Dept, The Washington Post represents the CIA, and the New York Times represents the DOJ. The sourcing for information into these conduits is specialized sources, and the pattern of information dissemination never changes. Once you understand how this works, you are more able to discern what the government position is on any specific “story” or information.
Depending on the issue, you will notice this pattern never changes. It is the one constant in an ever-changing information war.
Every once in a while, it is worth reminding ourselves of this fundamental baseline. The pattern never changes.
All the best,
Sundance