|
Post by NFA on Oct 16, 2023 7:59:26 GMT 8
CP – To comment on “No, says FNQ”, 16/10 TB - To comment on “No one cares”, 16/10 GCB - To comment on “The people reject Voice”, 16/10 CM - To comment on “No to Voice, yes to treaty”, 16/10 DT - To comment on “Now get on with it”, 16/10 HS - To comment on “Get back on track”, 16/10 -
The Voice result proves what I’ve been saying for quite some time: our elected representatives aren’t representing us. The only electorates that voted for it were where the spongers who acquire undeserved wealth in the orbit of governments live. The people who wanted more government and more taxation to pay for it voted for the Voice. The people who don’t trust the government, who don’t benefit much from government, and who want a reduction in the size and reach of government – the majority of Australians – voted against it.
If our elected representatives fail to take heed of the sentiment expressed by the Voice result and don’t immediately start work on minimising the impact government has on Aussies’ lives and the strain it puts on our budgets, then we need to implement the solution I have previously outlined.
We need to vote The Globalist Establishment’s anti-Australian parties out.
Jennifer Short Edge Hill
|
|
|
Post by NFA on Oct 16, 2023 8:06:19 GMT 8
Subject: RE: Why the vote was destined to fall short
The Editor The Cairns Post Even after their obliteration at the referendum, the “Yes23 insiders” and some media elites still don’t get it, (Why the vote was destined to fall short, 16/10). All legacy media and left-wing social media was inundated with pro-Voice messaging, but a Yes23 spokesleftie said, “We were holding events and rallies but it was just really hard to get people to pay attention.” Oh, we paid attention alright – but you lost our respect when you started lying, dissembling, re-inventing, and prevaricating. We turned off completely when you started calling us names, hitting us, and spitting on us. James Campbell says, “This ignorance about the Voice among voters persisted despite the Voice being the biggest political story of the year.” It wasn’t ignorance, James: we’d heard enough to know it gave one race additional rights and was therefore racist by definition. It was only the biggest political story in the minds of the big end of town and their bought-and-paid-for media. For us, the biggest political story is Australia’s obscene excess death rate since the Covid injections, which you still pretend doesn’t exist. (181 words) Peter Campion Tolga
|
|
|
Post by NFA on Oct 16, 2023 8:52:37 GMT 8
Subject: RE: Far North Queensland rejects Voice proposal
The Editor The Cairns Post The Voice vote has proven yet again that the left can’t forecast the unintended consequences of their actions. They thought that by giving us only part of the Uluru statement and denying the existence of the rest they could get the result they wanted. Instead it woke up the masses to the extent of left-wing misinformation, (Far North Queensland rejects Voice proposal, 6/10). The full 112-page version of the Uluru statement released by the NIAA under FOI, and which we all downloaded courtesy of News Corp, references “UNDRIP” nine times. UNDRIP is the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and that’s what was ultimately driving the big end of town’s support for the Voice. That’s right, the left’s claim that only “conspiracy theorists” thought the UN was driving the Voice was disinformation. Their claim that the Voice was only a minor change was malinformation: it was always intended to put even more Australian land under UN control. What do I mean “even more”? Remember “World Heritage Listed” forests and Reef? They’re already under UN (UNESCO) control. The UN is a communist organisation and is the enemy of all democratic nations. Always was, always will be. UN-exit now. (199 words) Peter Campion Tolga
|
|
|
Post by NFA on Oct 16, 2023 10:01:54 GMT 8
DT – To comment on “Remote indigenous communities in favour of proposal“, 16/10 HS – To comment on “First nations in affirmative”, 16/10 - Health Minister Mark Butler probably couldn’t be more disconnected from the remote community people of Lingiari but claims it’s a “furphy” to suggest they didn’t overwhelmingly support the Voice, (Remote indigenous communities in favour of proposal, 16/10). If you’ve worked with community people you’ll know they’re not particularly interested in “city business” and they try to be agreeable when confronted with it. They’ll vote Labor or Yes just to politely get done with whichever left-wing activist is in their space demanding their instant attention. If the person in their space had said, “we want you to say Yes to more bureaucrats in Canberra to speak on your behalf and their jobs will depend on your continuing disadvantage”, the result would have been a resounding No. Jennifer Short Edge Hill
|
|