|
Post by NFA on Sept 17, 2023 5:24:41 GMT 8
RE: Big banks’ move after cash scrapped
The Editor The Sunday Mail
A 67-word story on page five (SM, 17/09) should send chills down every sensible Australian’s spine.
Titled “Big banks’ move after cash scrapped” it includes the sentence, “Commonwealth Bank, ANZ, NAB and Westpac all confirmed on Friday that there are no current plans to go cashless.”
“… no current plans…”.
Ending cash is a globalist objective designed to force everyone into compliance with their anti-human agenda.
Their intended replacement, central bank digital currencies, will be programmable.
Unelected globalists will be able to dictate to you what you can buy, where you must buy it, and when you must buy it.
They will be able to turn the value of your savings down if you err and off if you fail to comply.
In the event of a regional power outage due to a cyclone, you will have no purchasing ability.
Same in the event of the now-inevitable long-term “system black” grid failure from either a solar flare or over-reliance on renewables.
If the ALP-LNP twins were representing the will of their voters, they’d be telling these banks that if they refuse to continue with cash they will lose their licenses to operate.
They won’t, of course, because the twins have long been owned and operated by the globalists.
(208 words)
Peter Campion Tolga
|
|
|
Post by NFA on Sept 17, 2023 9:34:00 GMT 8
To comment on “Locked in a battle of the bottleneck”, 17/09 -
The tradition of our nation was to build infrastructure gradually, in line with natural population growth, (“Locked in a battle of the bottleneck”, 17/09). But then, without asking us, the Liberal and Labor parties pursued their Big Australia policies, which swamped our infrastructure and now we’ve almost no hope of catching up.
If their plan is to introduce the UN’s so-called “Sustainability Goals”, where private vehicle ownership is banned and citizens are restricted to 15-minute cities, then deliberately overloading the road network is a way of forcing mass compliance. In fact, their recent policy settings are all illogical and irrational until they’re considered from the UN’s global control-grid perspective.
At some point in our past, our Constitutional Monarchy was quietly replaced with a UNiparty dictatorship in which our vote is valueless as the choice is illusory.
Jennifer Short Edge Hill
|
|
|
Post by NFA on Sept 17, 2023 9:39:33 GMT 8
Jennifer,
Australia's participation in signing "treaties" has removed any semblance of democracy from "we, the people".
|
|
|
Post by NFA on Sept 17, 2023 10:16:17 GMT 8
To comment on “Power bill relief as rebates get $100m”, 17/09 -
Either NSW’s handsomely-paid politicians and exorbitantly-remunerated bureaucrats are stupid or they think the people of NSW are, (“Power bill relief as rebates get $100m”, 17/09). The Minns government has no money of its own: it only has what it extracts from the public. Giving money to some people to compensate them for the unavoidable fact that renewables are causing power costs to skyrocket takes that money from someone else at a net loss to the state’s economy.
NSW cannot return to affordable electricity and the economic prosperity it brings until the Labor and Liberal parties cease their pointless obsession with reducing the gas that feeds plants. Even if CO2 could “trap heat”, (it can’t), China is giving lip-service to the globalists driving renewables and increasing its emissions exponentially. If CO2 was the control knob for climate, (it isn’t), the hand on it is Chinese.
If the Minns and Albanese Labor governments and their immediate Liberal predecessors were trying to collapse the NSW and Australian economies, would it look any different?
Jennifer Short Edge Hill
|
|
|
Post by NFA on Sept 17, 2023 14:23:40 GMT 8
To comment on “Court bid to gag Trump”, 17/09 -
The first ten amendments to the US Constitution form the US Bill of Rights: here’s the text of the First Amendment.
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Congress makes the laws for the US, not the courts. The Judiciary’s role is to administer those laws. The Bill of Rights are limits on the government and any law that contravenes the Constitution is invalid. The special counsel calling for an abridgement of President Trump’s freedom of speech is in breach of his oath to defend the Constitution, (“Court bid to gag Trump”, 17/09). It should alert Americans that their legal system has been weaponised to achieve the left’s political objectives.
Jennifer Short Edge Hill
|
|
|
Post by Struth on Sept 24, 2023 11:15:43 GMT 8
We have already been taken over by communists. If we can admit that then we would realise a defensive approach is longer of any use. We must attack them hard with the thing they can't win against. Truth
|
|