On Giving the WEF/UN/WHO Pandemic Power over Australia
Sept 10, 2023 4:37:08 GMT 8
NFA and Struth like this
Post by NFA on Sept 10, 2023 4:37:08 GMT 8
Readers here might like to respond to the Australian Government's survey on the WHO’s IHR - consultations.health.gov.au/health-systems-policy-division/preparing-for-pandemics-and-health-emergencies/
There’s some ideas for responses here - australiaexitsthewho.com/#gov-health-aged-survey
These are my reponses…
PC
1. How can international cooperation be improved to more effectively prevent, prepare for, and respond to, future pandemics and other international health emergencies?
It is extremely dangerous to our democracy to have unelected supranational organisations determining how we do anything.
Following the directions/suggestions of the WHO from 2020 to 2023 resulted in our elected representatives and health officials behaving in ways which breached our Constitution (S.51 xxiiiA), were against our natural rights (inc. UDHR), were in breach of the Nuremberg Code, and removed the medical autonomy of the individual.
That requires examination at a Royal Commission which has open terms of reference.
Sure, we can listen to what other countries are saying, but we must not be subject to any control or coercion by the WHO or any other international body ever again.
The WHO were wrong on every level, which is why we have around 40,000 excess deaths so far this year.
The WHO cannot be trusted.
They ignored natural immunity.
They worked to block therapeutics which have since been acknowledged to work effectively, such as ivermectin plus zinc plus azithromycin plus vitamins C and D3.
They did so to ensure the pharmaceutical companies got their “emergency use” exemptions on proper testing.
The WHO’s collusion with corporations cost up to 20 million people their lives while enriching those corporations.
Any Australian government official or politician who recommends entering an agreement that gives the WHO power to tell Australians what to do is a traitor and deserves to be jailed for the rest of their life.
We do not need “international cooperation” “to more effectively prevent, prepare for, and respond to, future pandemics and other international health emergencies” because that proved to be disastrous for our health during the Covid-19 era.
Tell the anti-scientific anti-humanist communist imbeciles at the WHO to shove their IHR where the sun doesn’t shine.
2. What issues do you think need to be prioritised to guide the world’s future preparation for, and responses to, future pandemics and other international health emergencies?
The premise of this question is quintessentially flawed.
If “the world” all does the same thing and it turns out to be the wrong thing as “the world’s” approach proved to be so very wrong during Covid-19, then the consequences will be far worse for humanity than they would have been if the best medical brains in every individual nation had applied their own intellect, initiative, and ingenuity and determined their own solutions.
For example, during Covid-19 many African nations who had experienced deaths and injuries from Bill Gates’ various vaccination efforts refused to participate in the WHO’s lockstepped tyranny.
Four African leaders died under mysterious circumstances, but nonetheless the obedience to the WHO remained low – and Africa suffered far fewer Covid and vaccine deaths and injuries than did countries that followed the unelected WHO like obedient but brain-dead sheep.
There is extraordinary danger in centralising power, and the bad outcomes of Covid-19 proved that.
Had Australia simply listened to our own Professor Thomas Borody and Professor Kylie Wagstaff we’d have had far fewer deaths and ScoMo may not have saddled us with crippling debt.
Following the WHO’s advice was a catastrophic failure of governance by every measure and it’s a mistake that we must not repeat.
If we want to “prepare” for the next virus that the US DoD creates and releases in a foreign country then we need to return pharmaceutical manufacturing to these shores – including precursor chemicals.
If we want to “respond” to future diseases then we need to honestly inform our people of the risks of the disease and the efficacy of the full range of treatments – and we absolutely must not vaccinate in the middle of an outbreak as science has long known of the antibody-dependent enhancement.
We absolutely must not join in a lockstepped march behind the WHO or any similar organisation as they have proven decisively that they cannot be trusted.
Every bit of advice they gave was wrong.
Masks don’t filter out airborne virus particles – they were a compliance measure and a visible indicator of obedience to Big Brother.
Social distancing was truly bizarre because it didn’t allow for air currents – all it did was alienate members of families and communities from each other.
Divide and conquer, right?
Lockdowns were the essence of stupidity – all they did was crush small and medium businesses and strengthen certain favoured major corporations while we all still rubbed shoulders in Coles and Bunnings.
The whole stupid set of responses were unprecedented, ineffective, unwarranted, destructive, costly, and unscientific – and they massively reduced trust in politicians, bureaucrats, unelected supranational organisations, and medical “experts”.
3. Is there any other information you would like to provide that might help to guide Australia’s engagement on a new international pandemic instrument and changes to the IHR?
Yes, the WHO, like the UN, is under the control of a shadowy group of extraordinarily wealthy individuals and families who do not have the best interests of humanity at heart.
Many of the known public faces of this group, who meet each year in Davos and in China, have openly stated that they believe there should be less humans on this planet.
In fact, populations of any species are self-limiting based on their abilities to adapt to changing circumstances, something our species is very, very good at.
Earth has abundant resources for hundreds of generations even with increasing population, so long as we don’t allow uberwealthy Malthusian depopulationists to interfere with our current and future technological successes – such as by trying to ban hydrocarbon fuels, trying to power electricity grids from weather dependent and time-of-day dependent generators, and mandating one-size-fits-all medical protocols which turn out to be as dangerous or more dangerous than the disease in question.
To be clear, to sign up the WHO’s IHR is something only traitors would do and it will result in millions of dead Australians, the dissolution of our sovereignty, and ultimately our enslavement under their planned new world order one world government.
And don’t try and call that a “conspiracy theory” – doing so is the Godwin’s Law distraction squirrel of the 2020s and people who use that term show they’re either incredibly ignorant or part of the globalists’ network.
They globalists had a world government summit in Dubai earlier this year – look it up.
There’s some ideas for responses here - australiaexitsthewho.com/#gov-health-aged-survey
These are my reponses…
PC
1. How can international cooperation be improved to more effectively prevent, prepare for, and respond to, future pandemics and other international health emergencies?
It is extremely dangerous to our democracy to have unelected supranational organisations determining how we do anything.
Following the directions/suggestions of the WHO from 2020 to 2023 resulted in our elected representatives and health officials behaving in ways which breached our Constitution (S.51 xxiiiA), were against our natural rights (inc. UDHR), were in breach of the Nuremberg Code, and removed the medical autonomy of the individual.
That requires examination at a Royal Commission which has open terms of reference.
Sure, we can listen to what other countries are saying, but we must not be subject to any control or coercion by the WHO or any other international body ever again.
The WHO were wrong on every level, which is why we have around 40,000 excess deaths so far this year.
The WHO cannot be trusted.
They ignored natural immunity.
They worked to block therapeutics which have since been acknowledged to work effectively, such as ivermectin plus zinc plus azithromycin plus vitamins C and D3.
They did so to ensure the pharmaceutical companies got their “emergency use” exemptions on proper testing.
The WHO’s collusion with corporations cost up to 20 million people their lives while enriching those corporations.
Any Australian government official or politician who recommends entering an agreement that gives the WHO power to tell Australians what to do is a traitor and deserves to be jailed for the rest of their life.
We do not need “international cooperation” “to more effectively prevent, prepare for, and respond to, future pandemics and other international health emergencies” because that proved to be disastrous for our health during the Covid-19 era.
Tell the anti-scientific anti-humanist communist imbeciles at the WHO to shove their IHR where the sun doesn’t shine.
2. What issues do you think need to be prioritised to guide the world’s future preparation for, and responses to, future pandemics and other international health emergencies?
The premise of this question is quintessentially flawed.
If “the world” all does the same thing and it turns out to be the wrong thing as “the world’s” approach proved to be so very wrong during Covid-19, then the consequences will be far worse for humanity than they would have been if the best medical brains in every individual nation had applied their own intellect, initiative, and ingenuity and determined their own solutions.
For example, during Covid-19 many African nations who had experienced deaths and injuries from Bill Gates’ various vaccination efforts refused to participate in the WHO’s lockstepped tyranny.
Four African leaders died under mysterious circumstances, but nonetheless the obedience to the WHO remained low – and Africa suffered far fewer Covid and vaccine deaths and injuries than did countries that followed the unelected WHO like obedient but brain-dead sheep.
There is extraordinary danger in centralising power, and the bad outcomes of Covid-19 proved that.
Had Australia simply listened to our own Professor Thomas Borody and Professor Kylie Wagstaff we’d have had far fewer deaths and ScoMo may not have saddled us with crippling debt.
Following the WHO’s advice was a catastrophic failure of governance by every measure and it’s a mistake that we must not repeat.
If we want to “prepare” for the next virus that the US DoD creates and releases in a foreign country then we need to return pharmaceutical manufacturing to these shores – including precursor chemicals.
If we want to “respond” to future diseases then we need to honestly inform our people of the risks of the disease and the efficacy of the full range of treatments – and we absolutely must not vaccinate in the middle of an outbreak as science has long known of the antibody-dependent enhancement.
We absolutely must not join in a lockstepped march behind the WHO or any similar organisation as they have proven decisively that they cannot be trusted.
Every bit of advice they gave was wrong.
Masks don’t filter out airborne virus particles – they were a compliance measure and a visible indicator of obedience to Big Brother.
Social distancing was truly bizarre because it didn’t allow for air currents – all it did was alienate members of families and communities from each other.
Divide and conquer, right?
Lockdowns were the essence of stupidity – all they did was crush small and medium businesses and strengthen certain favoured major corporations while we all still rubbed shoulders in Coles and Bunnings.
The whole stupid set of responses were unprecedented, ineffective, unwarranted, destructive, costly, and unscientific – and they massively reduced trust in politicians, bureaucrats, unelected supranational organisations, and medical “experts”.
3. Is there any other information you would like to provide that might help to guide Australia’s engagement on a new international pandemic instrument and changes to the IHR?
Yes, the WHO, like the UN, is under the control of a shadowy group of extraordinarily wealthy individuals and families who do not have the best interests of humanity at heart.
Many of the known public faces of this group, who meet each year in Davos and in China, have openly stated that they believe there should be less humans on this planet.
In fact, populations of any species are self-limiting based on their abilities to adapt to changing circumstances, something our species is very, very good at.
Earth has abundant resources for hundreds of generations even with increasing population, so long as we don’t allow uberwealthy Malthusian depopulationists to interfere with our current and future technological successes – such as by trying to ban hydrocarbon fuels, trying to power electricity grids from weather dependent and time-of-day dependent generators, and mandating one-size-fits-all medical protocols which turn out to be as dangerous or more dangerous than the disease in question.
To be clear, to sign up the WHO’s IHR is something only traitors would do and it will result in millions of dead Australians, the dissolution of our sovereignty, and ultimately our enslavement under their planned new world order one world government.
And don’t try and call that a “conspiracy theory” – doing so is the Godwin’s Law distraction squirrel of the 2020s and people who use that term show they’re either incredibly ignorant or part of the globalists’ network.
They globalists had a world government summit in Dubai earlier this year – look it up.