|
|
Post by NFA on Aug 25, 2023 8:11:36 GMT 8
RE: Geoff “the wannabe tyrant” Holland, Letters
The Editor
The Cairns Post
Scientists debate their ideas endlessly, for debate is the essence of science. It is through debate that ideas are explored fully and true scientists know consensus belongs in religion and politics.
Local greenie Geoff Holland (Letters, 25/08) doesn’t want to debate his ideas because he knows they’ll be destroyed, so he wants to censor his opponents instead.
Commenting on Councillor Olds' perfectly correct comments on the climate wrongology, Geoff says, “It is disinformation which goes beyond the limits of free speech for a public official.”
Free speech is the foundational human right on which all other human rights are built. Throughout history, tyrants and oppressors have always attacked free speech first.
When limits are imposed on free speech by tyrants, the rule of law collapses, freedom ends, and millions die.
An old saying says, “scratch a greenie, find a fascist”, and Geoff Holland lends credence to that.
(147 words)
Peter Campion
Tolga
|
|
|
|
Post by NFA on Aug 25, 2023 8:13:19 GMT 8
To comment on “Cultural criminality”, 25/08
-
When I look at someone, the first things I notice are their demeanour, attitude, and actions. The second things are their clothes, cleanliness, and hair. Should I engage with them I may judge them on their comments and the content of their character they reveal. Their race and sex is immaterial because we have no say over the genetics we inherit.
When a left-winger looks at someone, the first things they see are race, sex, and victimhood status. They judge others solely on things they have no control over. Michael Barry Henderson’s letter is a classic example of that left-wing mind-set, (“Cultural criminality”, 25/08).
Mr Henderson, if any white person alive today has “burgled” aboriginal land and culture it can only be those you elect who have prevented them from developing the abundant resources locked up on aboriginal land and kept them in squalor so you can claim at each election that only you can fix it.
Jennifer Short
Edge Hill
|
|
|
|
Post by NFA on Aug 25, 2023 8:16:31 GMT 8
RE: Radio host unloads on AEC
The Editor
The Townsville Bulletin
Ben Fordham was right to rip into the AEC over their bizarre decision to count a tick as “yes” for the Voice but to not count a cross as “no”, (Radio host unloads on AEC, 25/08). The AEC is as dodgy as the ABC, CSIRO, and BoM.
I’ve run in a federal election and received scrutineers’ reports, which listed examples of AEC personnel engaging in behaviours that could change an election outcome, including counting ballots that had not been issued by an AEC worker.
A candidate I know in Brisbane filmed an AEC employee taking pre-poll ballot boxes home for the night which broke the chain of custody, which was the subject of a media release by the party leader at the time.
Recently the AEC established a “fact-checking unit”, which is what all public institutions that have been captured by political activists do to suppress truth.
I’ve engaged with AEC over ballot security and they argue that zip-ties cannot be released and re-used, which is blatantly false as I do it all the time on the farm.
I’ve requested that ballot security be improved and suggested ways that could be done, but the AEC dismissed them instantly by saying their employees were trustworthy.
There’s no place for “trust in employees” in high stakes elections because activists will work very hard to get into the key positions.
Around a million people protested the Dan Andrews government in 2021 and 2022, but somehow that only translated into 114,000 votes for freedom parties - anyone who doesn’t suspect Australian elections are rigged hasn’t been paying attention.
(263 words)
Peter Campion
Tolga
|
|
|
|
Post by NFA on Aug 25, 2023 8:20:50 GMT 8
RE: Ticked off by a ballot
The Editor
The Daily Telegraph
The AEC’s decision to count a tick as “yes” for the Voice but to not count a cross as “no”, (Ticked off by a ballot, 25/08) is more than bizarre: they’re now as dodgy as the ABC, CSIRO, and BoM.
I’ve run in a federal election and received scrutineers’ reports, which listed examples of AEC personnel engaging in behaviours that could change an election outcome, including counting ballots that had not been issued by an AEC worker.
A candidate I know in Brisbane filmed an AEC employee taking pre-poll ballot boxes home for the night, which broke the chain of custody and was the subject of a media release by the party leader at the time.
Recently the AEC established a “fact-checking unit”, which is what all public institutions that have been captured by political activists do to suppress truth.
I’ve engaged with the AEC over ballot box security and they argue that zip-ties cannot be released and re-used, which is blatant misinformation as I do it all the time on the farm.
I’ve requested that ballot security be improved and suggested ways that could be done, but the AEC dismissed them instantly by saying their employees were trustworthy.
There’s no place for “trust in employees” in high stakes elections because activists will work very hard to get into the key positions.
Around a million people protested the Dan Andrews government in 2021 and 2022, but somehow that only translated into 114,000 votes for freedom parties - anyone who doesn’t suspect Australian elections are rigged hasn’t been paying attention.
(259 words)
Peter Campion
Tolga
|
|
|
|
Post by NFA on Aug 25, 2023 8:24:13 GMT 8
To comment on “The ‘Indian Eagle’ has landed”, 25/08
TB GCB CM DT HS - To comment on “The ‘Indian Eagle’ has landed”, 25/08
-
Why did it take the Chandrayaan-3 lunar mission six weeks from launch to landing when in 1969 it only took three days, (“The ‘Indian Eagle’ has landed”, 25/08)? Why did it need four landing thrusters and multiple stabilising thrusters when only one was needed in 1969? What happened to the 1960s technology and why did it all need to be reinvented recently?
When you realise that the 1960s and ‘70s moon landings never happened and were a massive psychological operation conducted by the US against everyone on Earth to achieve Cold War political objectives, you’ll begin to understand that they're doing the same with Covid, climate change, and renewable energy, too.
Jennifer Short
Edge Hill
|
|
|
|
Post by NFA on Aug 25, 2023 8:26:36 GMT 8
To comment on “Biden’s Covid probe censored ‘smoking gun’ discovery of intel agency scientists”, 25/08
-
Funny how things change with time. Those of us who said two years ago what Sharri Markson is reporting today, (“Biden’s Covid probe censored ‘smoking gun’ discovery of intel agency scientists”, 25/08), were “conspiracy theorists” and we were banned here and on social media. We were never conspiracy theorists; we’ve always been conspiracy analysts.
Now, don’t ask how we knew two years ago; ask why you didn’t.
Jennifer Short
Edge Hill
|
|
|
|
Post by NFA on Aug 25, 2023 8:28:41 GMT 8
Once again, some superb LtE's from Jennifer and Peter.
|
|
