|
Post by Struth on Jul 24, 2023 5:36:40 GMT 8
The Editor
The Australian
To be discriminated against because of your race you must look, sound, and behave like a specific race. If you look, sound, and behave like a Caucasian person it is extremely unlikely you will be assumed to be an Australian Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander person or that you will suffer discrimination on the basis of that assumption.
I attended school in Cairns in the 1970s and worked as a DSS Field Officer in the ‘80s and ‘90s where I met many hundreds of ATSI people, none of whom looked remotely like Professor Brenda Croft, (Art of war: ‘I’m not the right type of Aborigine’, 24/07).
Watching Professor Croft on YouTube confirmed that she looks, sounds, and behaves like a Caucasian person and nobody who knows ATSI people would assume her to be any type of ATSI person, much less the wrong type.
With so much money now being given to ATSI people we really should start doing our due diligence to confirm a person claiming to be ATSI looks, sounds, and behaves ATSI and isn’t simply claiming to be ATSI based on a distant ancestor.
Having a drop of ATSI blood in a majority Caucasian bloodstream does not lead to any form of discrimination but it seems to have become an excuse for accessing taxpayers’ money intended for those who are unmistakably ATSI.
(224 words)
Peter Campion
Tolga
|
|
|
Post by Struth on Jul 24, 2023 5:37:42 GMT 8
The Editor
The Cairns Post
To paraphrase pop singer Taylor Swift, alarmists gonna alarm, (Scorched earth future, 24/07).
I had a teacher at Cairns North State School back in the 1970s who was an early climate alarmist, only back then it was the coming ice age.
I even believed “the science” alarmists hold so precious for a while, but then none of their predictions came true – which proved their version of “science” to be incorrect.
In the absence of a testable hypothesis, reliable predictions are vital. There’s been 41 major climate predictions since 1973 and all of them have failed.
After 50 years, the political nature of climate alarmism is self-evident: leftist believe the narrative, conservatives don’t.
When you trace back the histories of the key players in this 50yo narrative, you find a group who have harnessed humanity’s ancient fear of bad weather to achieve a political outcome.
That political outcome would put absolute power over every Australian into the hands of a small group of unelected foreigners.
If you’re a leftist who loves Australia, it’s time to reject climate alarmism for your own good.
(181 words)
Peter Campion
Tolga
|
|
|
Post by Struth on Jul 24, 2023 5:39:16 GMT 8
Are there any leftists who love Australia?
|
|
|
Post by Struth on Jul 24, 2023 10:31:58 GMT 8
CP – To comment on “Scorched earth future”, 24/07 GCB – To comment on “Alarm at forecast”, 24/07 CM – To comment on “50c+ days, scorch heatwaves ahead”, 24/07 - As a physicist who can prove from first principles that carbon dioxide cannot trap heat and that it and all other atmospheric gases serve to transfer solar heat from the planet’s surface back to space, I despair at the gullibility of the miseducated masses who quiver in fear at forecasts as wildly wrong as those contained in the political IPCC’s RCP8.5, (“Scorched earth future”, 24/07). RCP8.5 isn’t even supported by the research it purports to represent and is a fiction contained only in the Summary for Policymakers. In fact, if you go to Table 12.12 in Chapter 12 of the IPCC’s AR6 report at this link, www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Chapter12.pdf, you’ll find a list of often-repeated frightening climate claims for which there is no evidence whatsoever. They include river floods, heavy precipitation and pluvial floods, landslides, drought (all types), severe wind storms, tropical cyclones, sand and dust storms, heavy snowfall and ice storms, hail, snow avalanche, coastal flooding, and marine heat waves. Climate alarmism is now and always has been nothing but political hot air designed to give ultimate power to an unelected few. Jennifer Short Edge Hill
|
|