|
|
Post by Struth on May 13, 2023 7:49:12 GMT 8
The Editor
The Cairns Post
The world’s leading GBR sedimentologist, Professor Peter Ridd, has made it perfectly clear that terrestrial sediment almost never reaches the Reef proper, ($6m for reef remedy, 13/05).
If sediment routinely reached the Reef its sand wouldn’t be white.
Shoreline reefs can cope with sediment because the sediment was there first - wildfires have always removed vegetation and caused erosion.
Revegetating riverbanks is fine but claiming it’s to “save the Reef” is disingenuous.
All of these “environmental destruction” scare stories are carefully engineered to transfer control of our natural assets to the unelected proto-world-government of the United Nations.
What do people think all the “World Heritage Listings” are really about?
We don’t need to be told how to manage our environment by wealthy European inbreds – they’re increasing their micromanagement of us incrementally because they’re establishing a global dictatorship.
(136 words)
Peter Campion
Tolga
|
|
|
|
Post by Struth on May 13, 2023 7:52:10 GMT 8
We don’t need to be told how to manage our environment by wealthy European inbreds – they’re increasing their micromanagement of us incrementally because they’re establishing a global dictatorship.
A pleasure to read words so succinctly put.
Wealthy European inbreds...fantastic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Struth on May 13, 2023 16:17:07 GMT 8
CM DT HS – To comment on “Carbon-capture strategy ‘a must’”, 13/05
Oz – To comment on “Nation ‘needs a carbon capture strategy’”, 13/05
-
If “carbon”, (actually CO2), was really a pollutant and not the rare trace gas on which all life depends, we still wouldn’t need a “carbon-capture and storage strategy”, (“Carbon-capture strategy ‘a must’”, 13/05). All we’d need to do is plant trees. That’s it. Nothing more. Problem solved.
However, carbon dioxide is not and never has been a pollutant. It has no capacity to “trap heat”. As a physicist, I can prove that from first principles – as can any other honest physicist. The entire CO2 heat-trapping narrative is a political control system developed over decades by a wealthy cult of depopulationist globalists.
They plan to make untold billions from “carbon-capture and storage” while steadily forcing you and your loved ones into grinding poverty and early death. Are you OK with that?
Jennifer Short
Edge Hill
|
|
|
|
Post by Struth on May 13, 2023 16:17:31 GMT 8
CP TB GCB - To comment on “No buffers for battlers”, 13/05
-
“One in two Australian workers are living pay cheque to pay cheque”, (“No buffers for battlers”, 13/05), and that’s entirely an artefact of anti-Australian government policies. With our natural resources we could and should have the highest per capita incomes of any nation on Earth.
We’re paying double what we should for food, four times as much as needed for fuels, three times as much for electricity, and five times as much for housing – and all of that is a direct result of government policies.
By subscribing to the various globalist hoaxes and scams, particularly the “carbon” scam and the “covid” hoax, we are being systematically stripped of our wealth while the globalists make enormous profits at our direct expense.
Our governments’ obedience to the globalists are steadily forcing you and your loved ones into grinding poverty and early death. Are you OK with that?
Jennifer Short
Edge Hill
|
|
|
|
Post by Struth on May 13, 2023 16:19:28 GMT 8
The Editor
The Australian
If Albo’s “voice” was a spontaneous homegrown concept, Australians would be getting plenty of opportunities for input into its design.
We’re not, (Altered voice out of question, 13/05), because it’s been inserted into Australian politics by globalists – exactly as has been done in New Zealand, Canada, and several other nations and their states.
It has a very specific design which will not be altered by us because its purpose is to place all our rural lands and waters under the globalists’ control via the UN.
Think “World Heritage Listing” on a mega scale.
If Albo’s “voice” was an original indigenous idea it may be worth considering – but it’s not, it’s a globalist intervention and it should be rejected by every rational Australian.
(122 words)
Peter Campion
Tolga
|
|
|
|
Post by Struth on May 14, 2023 6:48:52 GMT 8
This is why the voting for this will be rigged.
It's happening whether we like it or not, it's just keeping us all in delusion that we have a say.
And dumb Australians who were smart enough to be against the yes vote will be gullible enough to blame other Australians for voting for it,......when they didn't.
OUR VOTING IS RIGGED and anyone who believes it's not after the last few years, must prove it, not the other way around.
|
|
