|
Post by Nordic Homer on Mar 30, 2022 13:14:59 GMT 8
Towards Civilisational Rebirth. What should a civilisation coming out of Australia look like?
This is a thread topic not some kind of one post answer from me.
But one point I should make is that we cannot tolerate the Ayn Rand version of free speech anytime soon. Now that the system of usury has stolen almost everything, they just get their media to tell lies all the time. The power of lies was so strong, that when Putin outlawed media lies with stiff penalties, CNN had to skip the country. The knew it was not within their power to simply stop lying. I don't recognise Channel 7's right to any of their property. Not a single camera or microphone.
So thats something to think about. When media free speech means the media goes gunning to murder small children with vaccines, that is a mode of communication that has to be wiped out.
|
|
|
Post by Nordic Homer on Mar 30, 2022 14:26:47 GMT 8
We have to change our way of thinking about infrastructure spending. To us infrastructure spending is associated with big corporations peddling influence, Macquarie bank being the middle man and making a huge amount of loot doing next to nothing. Politicians signing dubious documents increasing our cost of living. Debt as far as the eye can see. And governments taking this spending off-balance-sheet so that their incapacity to run a surplus budget is made to look somewhat less catastrophic than it really is.
If we are thinking about civilsational rebirth we need to build and build and build, without debt, and without the conceit that we are necessarily going to benefit as individuals from this spending. The idea is to start projects. Run them slowly and without debt, so they can be run cost-effectively. And with a bit of luck, when you are very many years into the project, with as many problems sorted out, and everyone trained up on the skills level THEN you will find a way to speed the projects up cost-effectively.
Take the optical fibre scheme the Labour party had. The idea was just to allocate a 10,000 AUD dollar a day budget and start. Start communicating with local councils. Start scheduling when they were to dig up this or that street, and have people ready to put in the optical fibres. Don't dilly dally around for 20 years arguing about it. Don't then bring in Rothschilds and Meryl Lynch. Don't take it off-budget. None of that horseshit. Just start on a small tiny allowance. Everyone will know when you have a tight experienced team. It might be ten years on. It might be 25 years on. But there will be times where your productivity is manifest and you can speed things up. Once you've trained the people, and trained the trainers, and have all the best gear you can speed things up without compromising productivity.
Now with the above in mind our civilisation needs to rehydrate the continent. Once having achieved this we want all these transportable river systems all over the place. We want our Rhine, our Danube, our Dnieper. We need it all. You start off with a 5000 year perspective but sooner or later you can speed it up and we can get everything sorted in a much shorter time period. The first step is not to start widening rivers. The first thing is to put swales on the convex parts of the hills and check dams where the hills are concave. Silvopasture rather than pure pasture can be made the norm. Tighter herding to improve the soil and the soils water retention capacity. The buring of charred wood to put some permanent biochar in the soil.
After many decades of doing this we can manipulate clouds such that more rain falls on the land than on the sea. Its after this process that local rivers can be widened for transport. Later seaweed can be brought up these rivers in bulk to make the continent lush and productive.
We have to have a more sensible idea of technology than what nutballs like Kirchner are capable of. Its the failure to fully apply the more simple technologies that doom the high technology to being flash in the pan.
|
|
|
Post by srr on Mar 30, 2022 14:27:20 GMT 8
Very Related -
And the perverts have protection because to beat them would be considered "barbaric" in the West (and their protectors don't want top be beaten either), whereas what they do to children, babies even, is considered something to 'try to understand' ... while they desperately attack those who ask for convicted baby rapists and those who trade in children for rape, to be gaoled for life, because, 'We can't have That!'.
|
|
|
Post by Nordic Homer on Mar 30, 2022 14:34:51 GMT 8
Its not tangential at all. This glorification of developmental disorders is a sure sign of civilisational failure. Even back in the 90's you could have some truck driver who was reasonably macho during the week, but because of some psychological illness would feel the need to express himself by going to a club, dressing up as a chick and lip-synching Tina Turner and Cher songs. Well of course we can tolerate that. But we can't tolerate these people confusing the kids. This is the sort of craziness that ought not be allowed out in the open until the children have been put to bed. Do we seriously want to survive or not? Well survival and leading the good life doesn't start with confusing small children when they are still at their asexual or barely sexual level of development.
So we can't fuck around here. This must stop. This is after hours activity for people with disorders. Thats what we have to go back to.
|
|
|
Post by Nordic Homer on Mar 30, 2022 14:45:19 GMT 8
Its not really about beating up the damaged individuals who dress up to read childrens' stories. They are not the ones financing this show. We have to trace the chain of command back to some rich fellow who is making-it-happen and then we have to beat him up. The transvestites have been taken for a ride just like everyone else. That would be like hanging every nurse who gave out the death shots, but failing to send a hit team after Bourla.
|
|
|
Post by Struth on Mar 30, 2022 15:10:55 GMT 8
It's not rocket science. It's cultural Marxism and the march through the institutions, which any good coomo knows, the education or destruction thereof, of children is paramount. Killing manliness in those that you wish to enslave etc.
|
|
|
Post by Nordic Homer on Mar 30, 2022 15:46:33 GMT 8
Spirituality .... The Key to Spenglerian civilisational growth.
A reinvigorated civilisation needs a new spirituality to teach the kids. I like the idea of bringing spirituality back to trees and mountains, wood and stone. Jesus is a fine religious figure. But this excessive monotheism, that excludes all other aetheric consciousness, but angels, demons and the trinity, is oppressive. We need to have the kids feeling closer to nature.
Carl Yung probably had some good ideas. We have the experimental evidence that aetheric consciousness can be projected into water. And therefore it could also be projected into the old oak forest tree, which is largely made up of water. Technically speaking the fungal (mycelial) networks show a kind of intelligence that lends them to be a candidate for consciousness. Current theories of evolution would seem to be a bit lacking in plausibility without aetheric consciousness.
Water and waterfalls too. I missed out the waterfalls. Still (motionless) water tends to pull the electrical energy out of you. But moving water and sea water pushes it into you. It invigorates you and makes you healthy. Water that smashes down a long cavalcade of rocks becomes mineralised and some of it structured.
So what is wrong with the little boy thinking there are benign spirits in the forest. Not good or evil but friendly to him. He goes adventuring in the forest early morning and he sees the waterfall as conscious. His friend. His hand is on the tree so he receives the planets electrical energy. He stands underneath the waterfall and gets cold therapy, and electrical energy at the same time. He brings some of the potentially superior water home to drink.
There is nothing bad with infusing the little ones with some fairy stories of the consciousness of nature. And the thing is, these fairy stories MAY EVEN BE TRUE.
So if we teach the kids that there is friendly consciousness in the forest, and we bring him Tolkein and other writers that seem to imply something close to this, when he gets to be 12 years old and he says, you bullshitted me. Prove it. Well we can say that it was good for his psychology, and we have no idea the extent which this stuff may be true for real.
Certainly the philosophers who try and work out the mystery of consciousness have been unable to resolve matters without aetheric non-material consciousness as part of the solution. This is why they call it "the hard problem." These are smart people and if they could find a way to make consciousness a purely material phenomenon they probably would have worked it out by now.
I was a hardcore atheist until I found out aether-denial was a racket and an attempt to take over and control physics.
|
|