Post by Struth on Jun 24, 2021 6:45:21 GMT 8
The Australian Constitution.
Part of section 128
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 128
Mode of altering the Constitution [see Note 1]
This Constitution shall not be altered except in the following manner:
The proposed law for the alteration thereof must be passed by an absolute majority of each House of the Parliament, and not less than two nor more than six months after its passage through both Houses the proposed law shall be submitted in each State and Territory to the electors qualified to vote for the election of members of the House of Representatives.
A referendum must be held, in other words.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 117
Rights of residents in States
A subject of the Queen, resident in any State, shall not be subject in any other State to any disability or discrimination which would not be equally applicable to him if he were a subject of the Queen resident in such other State.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 51
Legislative powers of the Parliament [see Notes 10 and 11]
The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to:
(ix) quarantine;
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 109
Inconsistency of laws
When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.
Now there will be some people who will find the above all gobbledy gook and find it all so incomprehensible that not a word will be understood unless the official government interpreter explains what these laws mean.... as this constitution is the contract between the government and the people.
What could possibly go wrong letting one side of the contracted parties interpret the contract?
The government kicked the contract with the people to the gutter and now rule by force. By the gun.
I post these sections to remind us that is exactly what they have done.
The constitution, and especially the USA's constitution was written in plain English precisely for moments in history like this, and that is even stated.
We do not need the government to interpret this for us.
That is a submissive idiocy we can no longer afford.
All we need to do is read the clear English here so that we can know, that all bets are now off.
It is for us to decide whether the Government has kept itself in check and under the rule of Law.
Leaving that decision to the government is insanity.
They can tell us what they like.
And they have.
But we can read it for ourselves so we know where we stand and who the traitorous enemy is.
The founding fathers wrote our Constitutions for times like these, and we do not need it interpreted by anyone, let alone the people who have put themselves above it's laws and contract with the people.
The reason for my quoting of the Constitution way back when this coup d'etat took place, last year, was not because I expected the government would listen to us telling them that they have put themselves above the rule of law, or bringing it up would help us.
But we need to know in our hearts and minds, what they have done.
They have been told that is what they have done and they give not one shit.
And the AG will give no response, yet he has responded to letters without addressing the issue, informing him of the fact we know what they have done.
They know what they have done.
But it is for us to know and to be more understanding of the criminality of these people.
To read the plain English and be sure in our hearts we are on the righteous side as to what may happen next.
A federal government under the rule of law would not let state health departments make laws regarding quarantining , as quite ironically, 51 states "The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to: Quarantine"
And we would have had good governance regarding quarantine if they had just stuck to the rule of law.
Allowing a State health department to make laws regarding Quarantine is not only unconstitutional but idiotic.
Quarantine, as is now blatantly obvious, is a field of expertise not one state health bureaucrat knows the first thing about.
It's like putting the Police force in charge of defense.
They seem sort of similar from the outside, but are completely different roles and professions in reality.
As more and more insanity and yes, tyranny, is pushed upon us, It's probably time to reflect on just how criminal these people are.
The Constitution, in plain English, means there are no excuses.
Politicians being weak, or in fear, or whatever reason you would like to excuse their behaviour with, doesn't matter. The fact is if they'd not criminally put themselves above the rule of law, their personal failings would not be an issue.
Read the constitution and realise what we are dealing with.
The founders wrote it in plain English for precisely that reason.
Part of section 128
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 128
Mode of altering the Constitution [see Note 1]
This Constitution shall not be altered except in the following manner:
The proposed law for the alteration thereof must be passed by an absolute majority of each House of the Parliament, and not less than two nor more than six months after its passage through both Houses the proposed law shall be submitted in each State and Territory to the electors qualified to vote for the election of members of the House of Representatives.
A referendum must be held, in other words.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 117
Rights of residents in States
A subject of the Queen, resident in any State, shall not be subject in any other State to any disability or discrimination which would not be equally applicable to him if he were a subject of the Queen resident in such other State.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 51
Legislative powers of the Parliament [see Notes 10 and 11]
The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to:
(ix) quarantine;
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 109
Inconsistency of laws
When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.
Now there will be some people who will find the above all gobbledy gook and find it all so incomprehensible that not a word will be understood unless the official government interpreter explains what these laws mean.... as this constitution is the contract between the government and the people.
What could possibly go wrong letting one side of the contracted parties interpret the contract?
The government kicked the contract with the people to the gutter and now rule by force. By the gun.
I post these sections to remind us that is exactly what they have done.
The constitution, and especially the USA's constitution was written in plain English precisely for moments in history like this, and that is even stated.
We do not need the government to interpret this for us.
That is a submissive idiocy we can no longer afford.
All we need to do is read the clear English here so that we can know, that all bets are now off.
It is for us to decide whether the Government has kept itself in check and under the rule of Law.
Leaving that decision to the government is insanity.
They can tell us what they like.
And they have.
But we can read it for ourselves so we know where we stand and who the traitorous enemy is.
The founding fathers wrote our Constitutions for times like these, and we do not need it interpreted by anyone, let alone the people who have put themselves above it's laws and contract with the people.
The reason for my quoting of the Constitution way back when this coup d'etat took place, last year, was not because I expected the government would listen to us telling them that they have put themselves above the rule of law, or bringing it up would help us.
But we need to know in our hearts and minds, what they have done.
They have been told that is what they have done and they give not one shit.
And the AG will give no response, yet he has responded to letters without addressing the issue, informing him of the fact we know what they have done.
They know what they have done.
But it is for us to know and to be more understanding of the criminality of these people.
To read the plain English and be sure in our hearts we are on the righteous side as to what may happen next.
A federal government under the rule of law would not let state health departments make laws regarding quarantining , as quite ironically, 51 states "The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to: Quarantine"
And we would have had good governance regarding quarantine if they had just stuck to the rule of law.
Allowing a State health department to make laws regarding Quarantine is not only unconstitutional but idiotic.
Quarantine, as is now blatantly obvious, is a field of expertise not one state health bureaucrat knows the first thing about.
It's like putting the Police force in charge of defense.
They seem sort of similar from the outside, but are completely different roles and professions in reality.
As more and more insanity and yes, tyranny, is pushed upon us, It's probably time to reflect on just how criminal these people are.
The Constitution, in plain English, means there are no excuses.
Politicians being weak, or in fear, or whatever reason you would like to excuse their behaviour with, doesn't matter. The fact is if they'd not criminally put themselves above the rule of law, their personal failings would not be an issue.
Read the constitution and realise what we are dealing with.
The founders wrote it in plain English for precisely that reason.