Post by Struth on Jun 22, 2021 6:40:00 GMT 8
Watching Alan Jones on Sky last night and was gobsmacked at the idiocy or indeed the "con"-mplicitness of a guest professor from Melbourne university.
Either way, a bright spark it was not, and unfortunately, an idiot easily nailed by Jones is often not challenged.
This great germ of a human, actually stated that the reason the over sixties were still being given the death poison is because it "seemed" it wasn't affecting the elderly like it kills the young, but get this......THEY WERE MONITORING IT CLOSELY"
This to me was a statement that shows the murderous intent of socialists and they're level of emotional lack of reasoning to justify anything, even mass murder, yet it went straight to the keeper and Jones did not even swing.
I do not wish to insult the reader, but just in case you have a communist bent like some visitors to other right wing blogs, let me point out to you what he means.
Giving this out to the entire world and pressuring people to have it by dangling freedom in front of them is killing people and they are "monitoring this closely".
They are not stopping it!!
That means this is an experiment conducted on millions, with thousands world wide already dead. Not from Covid, but specifically from the vaccine.
While they are killing you, it's reassuring to know it will be monitored closely.
That's a relief.
But only if you are young.
The reason it only seems young people are dying of the blood clots and other issues specific to the poison, is because they are harder to hide as natural deaths.
Over 60's death is a "piece of piss" (to use an Australian term to describe how it's too easy) to lie about an unquestioned over 60's death.
Because over 60's do not appear to be dying from the vaccine does not mean they are not.
It's just harder to spin the deaths of the healthy thirty year olds as natural straight after a jab , dying of a rare blood clot, now not so rare once the poison is taken.
How many autopsies are done on the deaths of the elderly?
Apologize to the right wing readers who already have that level of common sense and scepticism.
We might get the occasional "emotion before fact" lefty here.
Either way, a bright spark it was not, and unfortunately, an idiot easily nailed by Jones is often not challenged.
This great germ of a human, actually stated that the reason the over sixties were still being given the death poison is because it "seemed" it wasn't affecting the elderly like it kills the young, but get this......THEY WERE MONITORING IT CLOSELY"
This to me was a statement that shows the murderous intent of socialists and they're level of emotional lack of reasoning to justify anything, even mass murder, yet it went straight to the keeper and Jones did not even swing.
I do not wish to insult the reader, but just in case you have a communist bent like some visitors to other right wing blogs, let me point out to you what he means.
Giving this out to the entire world and pressuring people to have it by dangling freedom in front of them is killing people and they are "monitoring this closely".
They are not stopping it!!
That means this is an experiment conducted on millions, with thousands world wide already dead. Not from Covid, but specifically from the vaccine.
While they are killing you, it's reassuring to know it will be monitored closely.
That's a relief.
But only if you are young.
The reason it only seems young people are dying of the blood clots and other issues specific to the poison, is because they are harder to hide as natural deaths.
Over 60's death is a "piece of piss" (to use an Australian term to describe how it's too easy) to lie about an unquestioned over 60's death.
Because over 60's do not appear to be dying from the vaccine does not mean they are not.
It's just harder to spin the deaths of the healthy thirty year olds as natural straight after a jab , dying of a rare blood clot, now not so rare once the poison is taken.
How many autopsies are done on the deaths of the elderly?
Apologize to the right wing readers who already have that level of common sense and scepticism.
We might get the occasional "emotion before fact" lefty here.