Legality

I have often turned to the Commonwealth of Australia's constitution as it is the highest Law of the land.
It cannot be changed without referendum and, is of course, meant to be followed by all in a rule of Law country.

I am wondering, (when it is crystal clear), that when both the Commonwealth and the State governments are not following it, why no journalist is calling them out on it.
Well, we all know why they are not, so maybe it's time, in our new world order that we find a way to hold our recently non accountable overlords to account.

Let's have a brief look at how the power of decision making is supposed to occur, and what is happening.
Firstly we must understand sect 109 of the constitution.
That is the Australian Constitution that was banned from being taught in schools.
Yes we have one.

Section 109 of the Constitution of Australia provides that: When a law of a State is inconsistent with a law of the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail, and the former shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be invalid.


So this means it over rides state laws that conflict with it.

Hmmm.


So let's take our state border closures , the excuse being our state government's quarantining.
At the Qld border you will be allowed straight through and into QLD if you have QLD number plates on the car, or if you are driving a truck, without being stopped and checked. 
However, if you do not live in QLD, you are not allowed in.
That is obviously not a quarantine procedure, it's add hoc discrimination that has no quarantine benefit whatsoever.
Idiotic waste of taxpayers money for no benefit?
Why yes, yes it is.
Harassment of Australian citizens and a tyrannical affront to the free movement of citizens for no effective reason? 

Why yes, yes it is.

Would you agree to it if they stopped all people from crossing the borders and really looked into people's movements?
For example, had a Queenslander just come off a cruise ship in Sydney?
Actual Quarantining measures?

Well if you said yes, you would be still supporting a criminal outfit, but the crime would be less severe.

Let's check out sect 117 of the constitution.

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA CONSTITUTION ACT - SECT 117

A subject of the Queen, resident in any State, shall not be subject in any other State to any disability or discrimination which would not be equally applicable to him if he were a subject of the Queen resident in such other State.


A state government cannot discriminate against citizens of this nation based on their residency within the nation.
People often argue this, saying "but states all have different laws!"
Yes they do, but they apply equally to the visitor as to the resident of the state.
A state speed limit sign will never say 100kph for QLDers but visitors from interstate 80kph.
It is illegal for them to do it and they would be criminals, breaking the law the second they tried to introduce it.
Yet this is exactly what they are doing on our state borders regarding entry.
It is criminal activity, and ignorance of the Law is no excuse, especially when most of our pollies are ex Lawyers.

But does it get worse?
Yes, why yes it does.


When Australia became a nation on the 1st of January 1901, the constitution divided up the responsibilities of governments, state and Federal.

For example, no state can raise it's own military forces, that is a Federal government responsibility.

Oh No.

So is quarantine.
What is your state government doing operating quarantine activities?
It's very specific, and remember sect 109.
Well here is section 51(ix)

Section 51 of the Constitution provides that the Commonwealth can pass laws for the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to (IX) quarantine.



Section 61 backs it up.

On a date or dates to be proclaimed by the Governor‑General after the establishment of the Commonwealth the following departments of the public service in each State shall become transferred to the Commonwealth:



Posts, telegraphs, and telephones;

Naval and military defence;

Lighthouses, lightships, beacons, and buoys;

Quarantine.

But the departments of customs and of excise in each State shall become transferred to the Commonwealth on its establishment.[2][4]


Whether you or I believe States should be quarantining is irrelevant, it is against the law for state governments to do so.
And as soon as these power drunk traitors put themselves above the rule of law, it all starts to fall apart.
And we get the confusion, misery, tyranny and death we are now seeing.


Does it get worse.
Why yes, yes it does.

Laws cannot be made by decree of an unconstitutional parliament.
This COAG plus NZ PM or whoever else gets an invite to slurp drunkenly on power at the National cabinet, cannot make Laws.

Remember, there is no Prime Minister position in our Constitution.
He is just the head spokesman for his political party and as a minister gets to "advise" the executive Government.

The PM and the Premiers need to get back in their parliaments and start representing and debating and passing actual law as it is supposed to be done by law.

When it comes to Quarantine matters, the new quarantine bills are supposed to be debated in parliament and when passed , sent to the Governor General to be assessed and made Law.
In the event of a "state of emergency" as seems to be the call here, it is up to the ministers and executive government to advice the governor general who then makes the call. 

This is what is meant to happen by law.
Instead we are being ruled by the threat of violence and fines, of being arrested, our freedoms stolen and all by a group of criminals operating outside the rule of law.
Scott Morrison, and all the members of the National cabinet need to be arrested and thrown behind bars.
Make no mistake, they are criminals.