|
Post by NFA on Jul 2, 2023 4:52:45 GMT 8
RE: Braking point, Transport must be fixed
The Editor The Sunday Mail
There’s an additional factor to road congestion not mentioned in last Sunday’s story, (Braking point), or editorial, (Transport must be fixed), and it relates to the population growth mentioned in both.
When population growth is an artifact of prospering local communities, each road user has multiple generations of forebears who contributed to funding infrastructure growth.
When population growth is forced by importing foreigners, the additional road users have no multigenerational history of contributing to the infrastructure they use, so it is rapidly overwhelmed.
The solution is to require each new migrant to contribute on arrival to infrastructure commensurately with the family contributions of multigenerational Australians.
If that worked out to $1 million per arrival, we’d have infrastructure keeping pace with population growth and migrants less likely to be a net drain on Australian society.
(134 words) Peter Campion Tolga
|
|
|
Post by NFA on Jul 2, 2023 4:59:16 GMT 8
Peter C
Other non-Western countries require various amounts dependent on your status to immigrate to their country.
If some can pay whatever to people smugglers or so called 'edumacation' providers as a work around of Australian immigration law then they can kick in, so to speak.
Either that or they can go and live in Burke and not the cities!
Dickhead Malcolm Fraser started all this crap.
|
|
|
Post by NFA on Jul 2, 2023 5:41:51 GMT 8
RE: ‘Yes’ needs to make its voice heard
The Editor The Sunday Telegraph
An aspect of Albo’s Voice proposal that is never discussed in corporate media, (‘Yes’ needs to make its voice heard, 02/07), is Albo’s false claim that it is a “grassroots campaign”.
Albo’s Voice is suspiciously similar to equivalent movements in New Zealand, Canada, and some US states – all locations that have indigenous and settler populations.
A growing number of Australia’s indigenous elders are openly stating they were never consulted on Albo’s Voice and it has always been a top-down process: not at all “grassroots”.
An unelected foreign body is injecting the same idea into multiple national and state jurisdictions, and their reason for doing so does not benefit the indigenous or any other Aussie.
If Albo merely wanted to hear the voices of the indigenous, there’s billions of dollars’ worth of established bodies to listen to – without altering our Constitution.
Albo’s Voice is to benefit globalists, which deserves a hard No from all Australians.
(154 words) Peter Campion Tolga
|
|
|
Post by NFA on Jul 2, 2023 5:46:21 GMT 8
|
|