|
Post by Chilli on May 21, 2022 21:00:16 GMT 8
Scott Morrison. Fuck off! You were a soft right winger. Not strong enough.
A song from your Pentecostal church.
|
|
|
Post by NFA on May 21, 2022 21:26:12 GMT 8
|
|
|
Post by Chilli on May 21, 2022 21:32:51 GMT 8
|
|
|
Post by NFA on May 22, 2022 8:14:43 GMT 8
Australia Election – COVID Knucklehead Scott Morrison Out, Climate Change Knucklehead Anthony Albanese In May 21, 2022 | Sundance
|
|
|
Post by NFA on May 22, 2022 8:42:53 GMT 8
Reinvention time: Liberals tried to win wealthy inner city Woke seats and lost the nation
|
|
|
Post by Faulty Memory on May 22, 2022 10:36:18 GMT 8
And Clive Palmer preferencing Liberals instead of putting the sitting member last (sack them all), worked out extremely well for the UAP, didn't it? Quite possibly ditto for Pauline Hanson.
Hence the old saying . . . "if you lay down with dogs you'll get up with fleas".
|
|
|
Post by Struth on May 22, 2022 13:00:14 GMT 8
Now getting local scrutineers reporting in corrupt preference counting.
|
|
|
Post by Faulty Memory on May 22, 2022 13:36:50 GMT 8
"Now getting local scrutineers reporting in corrupt preference counting."
Impossible!!
I have it on good authority (I read it right here) that there are no scrutineers, and voting is controlled by Chinese operatives working on Chinese computers in China.
|
|
|
Post by Struth on May 22, 2022 13:45:39 GMT 8
Don't be a cock. The corruption occurs after the scrutineers have long gone. I never said there were no scrutineers. You're getting as bad as the little gang of sneerers. Can you please be polite enough to keep anything belonging to you, out of my mouth, including your words.
|
|
|
Post by Struth on May 22, 2022 13:47:45 GMT 8
from a facebook post around here.
|
|
|
Post by Faulty Memory on May 22, 2022 14:19:04 GMT 8
Yes, Struth.
And as I pointed to you at the time, it is almost impossible to alter the vote counts once they are done manually while overseen by scrutineers. It was tried at both the 2016 and 2019 federal elections (I didn't say it wasn't TRIED) but picked by scrutineers on both occasions.
All you have done now in your above posts is demonstrate that our manual system of counting with scrutineering works reasonably well contrary to your outbursts about non--existent computer counting and Chinese involvement. You were far closer to the mark with the telephone voting business. They relaxed the criteria dramatically, technically on Friday morning but with no publicity until Friday evening.
The subsequent possibilities for corruption are almost endless. I think you really hit the nail on the head with that one.
|
|
|
Post by Struth on May 22, 2022 14:28:10 GMT 8
There will be more than one way to skin the cat, but once those scrutineers are calling it out, as in the result isn't what they counted , it's because they quite readily admit that the preferences are calculated via computer, and with phones and all the rest, the scrutineers are basically only the start of the counting, they aren't checking on what happens next.
|
|
|
Post by Faulty Memory on May 22, 2022 15:13:09 GMT 8
Nah.
I'm not going through the process with you again, Struth. If you haven't got it by now, you never will.
Suffice to say it's not done in the counting, because that's scrutinised, and it's not in the "calculation of preferences", because they're not "calculated", and it's not on computers, because in this country it's not done on computers (yet).
As I said above, you were on the money with the phone in voting. No need for all the other, detectable stuff.
|
|
|
Post by Struth on May 22, 2022 15:56:49 GMT 8
When it comes to preferences, they get put to the candidate the AEC puts them toward. So basically they are sorted slackly, via voting preferences of the candidate, yes or no?
|
|
|
Post by srr on May 24, 2022 20:38:43 GMT 8
David Tee media @jcbible1 · 1h The Liberal Party should lodge a writ in the High Court of Australia, to recall the election. The "government" was sworn in illegally, prematurely and precipitately. No majority. Teal "independents" are ineligible for parliament because they vote in unison. @michaelsukkarmp
|
|