|
Post by Struth on Sept 15, 2021 7:12:35 GMT 8
|
|
|
Post by yyyguy on Sept 15, 2021 7:51:17 GMT 8
Nope, certainly wouldn't. Once upon a time TV was funded by advertisers who picked their slots in programs targeted at a certain audience. Now it's just sympathy porn, bears in chains, poor little Ahmed, save the koalas and so on. How can they possibly raise the funding for all the advertising? What's that? Donations from gummint and/or gummint agencies. And not to mention the 24/7 gummint adverts or what seem like Ch9 ads with Scott Cam and co, "Convid has affected us all". Nice presser from Clive yesterday. He has a nasty habit of winning court cases. Personally I'm not in favour of the drawn out legal process. I don't buy newspapers because they aren't but when one is left lying around I'll read it.. It's just adverts. But what I don't get is there seems to be an extraordinary amount of travel adverts. Gonna take a guess that ultimately they're paid for by gummint tourism agencies. Keep up the good work, struth.
|
|