|
Post by yyyguy on Jul 23, 2021 16:30:56 GMT 8
Best wishes MF.
|
|
|
Post by NFA on Jul 23, 2021 17:01:09 GMT 8
And I just saw I stuffed up MemoryFault name. My eyes are nearly shot so my apologies. And memoryfault ... no excuse ... get out of bed ya bastard and give us a serve...
|
|
|
Post by Struth on Jul 24, 2021 8:39:15 GMT 8
The raging MV is still alive, ready to smack the ever quivering Frank and co who are shit scared the minute he pulls out his catheter. I don't agree with everything MV says, and I don't disagree either. However, he certainly lives in the heads of the feeble.
|
|
|
Post by abacab on Jul 24, 2021 12:51:00 GMT 8
Great. No doubt his triumphant return will please the enfeebled.
But I wonder if the progenitor of the “Deakin Offices” scare of 1987 can do better than skulking around the comments threads of other people’s sites? Today’s protests are surely a sign that the ground is ripe for exploitation by a man of his conspiratorial nous? Surely this world of lockdowns, mass vaccinations and compulsory check-ins is close to the medical-cyber dystopia he was imagining back in the 1980s?
Just sayn’
|
|
|
Post by NFA on Jul 24, 2021 14:21:06 GMT 8
abacab the doxxer in general tell me where memoryfault touched you
|
|
|
Post by abacab on Jul 26, 2021 14:49:23 GMT 8
A pedo joke. Classy.
|
|
|
Post by NFA on Jul 26, 2021 19:47:13 GMT 8
Nothing to do with 'pedo' you ignorant arse wipe. Can you tell me what relevance your has to do with the current state of play as it is developing? I may as well say that Australians fought Italians and not one single Italian should ever comment again. Grow up abacadBRA
|
|
|
Post by memoryfault on Jul 26, 2021 23:48:10 GMT 8
How very interesting. Care to give a street address for these "Deakin Offices" that you claim I allegedly wrote about, ABACAB?
Choose carefully. For your answer will expose you as either a fool or a government operative. Either way, it will not be a good look for you. Nor perhaps a healthy one depending on how things pan out over the next year or so.
|
|
|
Post by abacab on Jul 27, 2021 20:07:10 GMT 8
How very interesting. Care to give a street address for these "Deakin Offices" that you claim I allegedly wrote about, ABACAB? Choose carefully. For your answer will expose you as either a fool or a government operative. Either way, it will not be a good look for you. Nor perhaps a healthy one depending on how things pan out over the next year or so. So, you have recovered. Good for you! As to your friendly query: My mistake, it was the "Deakin Centre" you wrote about, at least according to "One Man Banned", although the same book also refers to the "Deakin Offices" on Kent Street in the Canberra suburb of Deakin. I have found on Google Maps an address for the "Deakin Offices" at 109 Kent Street, and I presume that's the same building you were writing about. I guess you could clear that up.
|
|
|
Post by memoryfault on Jul 29, 2021 11:32:59 GMT 8
Recovering, not recovered, yet. Ingrown toenails can be a bitch.
You spin a fancy tale, ABACAB, but it has a hollow ring to it. I can't vouch for what might have been in Brian Wilshire's awful book allegedly about me, but he certainly wouldn't have called it the "Deakin Offices". When I first wrote about it in September 1987 they tried to palm it off as the new Deakin Telephone Exchange. That lie fell to pieces under scrutiny, and by the time the building was featured in 1988 on both "A Current Affair" and "Sixty Minutes", it was referred to as "The National Computer Centre". It even had a sign out the front to that effect.
It remained officially "The National Computer Centre" until the late 2000's when it became something like "The Defence Security Office" and was shown as such on Google Maps. Then in the early 2010's it ceased to have name altogether. That is how it remained at least until 2016 which is the last time I looked.
Then you come along a week ago and refer to it as "The Deakin Offices". I go and check on Google Maps, and quelle surprise that's what it is officially called now, complete with a sign out the front which claims it is "private property" (which is untrue). What are you - clairvoyant?
Tell me ABACAB, are you one of the few tasked with parking your car out the front to give the impression not many people are employed there, or do you get to park around the corner with the other REAL wukkas, in Hampden Place, behind the controlled gates, where you enter the main facility via the armed guard checkpoint?
One final point: If you are going to play these games best not to do it on a mobile phone during business hours, from the same location - as you mostly have. Wile it doesn't identify WHO you are, reverse triangulation makes it damnably easy to pinpoint WHERE you are. After that everything else is just a matter of time.
Maybe I should start giving lessons . . .
|
|
|
Post by abacab on Aug 1, 2021 15:42:18 GMT 8
Recovering, not recovered, yet. Ingrown toenails can be a bitch. You spin a fancy tale, ABACAB, but it has a hollow ring to it. I can't vouch for what might have been in Brian Wilshire's awful book allegedly about me, but he certainly wouldn't have called it the "Deakin Offices". When I first wrote about it in September 1987 they tried to palm it off as the new Deakin Telephone Exchange. That lie fell to pieces under scrutiny, and by the time the building was featured in 1988 on both "A Current Affair" and "Sixty Minutes", it was referred to as "The National Computer Centre". It even had a sign out the front to that effect. It remained officially "The National Computer Centre" until the late 2000's when it became something like "The Defence Security Office" and was shown as such on Google Maps. Then in the early 2010's it ceased to have name altogether. That is how it remained at least until 2016 which is the last time I looked. Then you come along a week ago and refer to it as "The Deakin Offices". I go and check on Google Maps, and quelle surprise that's what it is officially called now, complete with a sign out the front which claims it is "private property" (which is untrue). What are you - clairvoyant? Tell me ABACAB, are you one of the few tasked with parking your car out the front to give the impression not many people are employed there, or do you get to park around the corner with the other REAL wukkas, in Hampden Place, behind the controlled gates, where you enter the main facility via the armed guard checkpoint? One final point: If you are going to play these games best not to do it on a mobile phone during business hours, from the same location - as you mostly have. Wile it doesn't identify WHO you are, reverse triangulation makes it damnably easy to pinpoint WHERE you are. After that everything else is just a matter of time. Maybe I should start giving lessons . . . This is crazy. What appears to be a veiled threat of doxxing or worse over the name of a building!!! And accompanied by a deranged fantasy that maybe I'm a Deakin Offices employee trolling you from the Deakin Offices? (For the record I am not). But permit me, though, to illustrate by responding your points to demonstrate why are you have long been and clearly remain an untrustworthy source: 1. The building is identified as the "Deakin Offices" on page 28 of One Man Banned. Back on Catallaxy Files on December 18, 2015 you said in that 1997 Brian Wilshire gave you a box of copies of that book. Get your copy out and take another look! 2. I'm not "clairvoyant" and offer no "fancy tale" - from what I can see the building at 109 Kent Street has been officially described as the "Deakin Offices" as far back as 1985, well before you launched your scare campaign. One only has to do a search for the “Deakin Offices” on the Parliament of Australia website parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/search.w3p. There's 25 mentions of the "Deakin Offices" alone in the 1980s, and 49 in the 1990s, all referring to that building. So, no sixth sense or being a conspirator or “government operative” required. If you’re not happy with the building’s name, I humbly suggest you take it up with your local MP. 3. And it’s remarkable what you can find on that site, such as this response to a Question on Notice in the Senate, way, way, way back in 1982 about which Commonwealth department would own the new building and, more importantly, what would be going into it (remember there’s actually two buildings on the site, the old telephone exchange, apparently still used by Telstra at 107 Kent Street, and the then newer larger building at 109 Kent Street, that at one stage housed all those government computers that got people so het up three decades ago): While possessing neither MV’s vivid imagination nor his unique experiences in and out of government, methinks it’s a bit of a stretch to make claims about a “cover-up” if Government representatives were talking about the supposedly secret plan to turn the new building into a government computer centre openly in Parliament five years before MV hit the scene. Anyway, that’s all I’ve got to say on this matter.
|
|
|
Post by abacab on Aug 30, 2021 9:19:43 GMT 8
Where's he gone? It's been about a month now. Has MV's health taken a turn for the worse or has sought greener pastures?
|
|